Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Mon 27/05/24 04:11:45 GMT |
Message # 53525 Subject: question about married couples: wetlooker and non-participating individual Date: Mon 27/02/12 08:43:22 GMT Name: Jessica Email: friends@fantasystockings.com Website: http://www.fantasystockings.com/wetlook/ / www.fantasystockings.com/wetlook |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Hello,
My youtube channel mostly deals with pantyhose fetish and I must admit that I get a lot of upset e-mails about how the wife doesn't want to wear pantyhose for the husband at all, not even on special occasions. In fact, I am trying to put together a section of my blog that explains fetishes and gives advice to such couples on how to understand what fetish means and why someone can't get rid of it at will just because the partner wants it so.
I don't seem to be getting anything of that sort from wetlookers. Nobody wrote to me so far that their partner doesn't want to share their love for splashing.
Do you think that wetlook fetish is more socially acceptable then pantyhose fetish? Even let's say Felini did a scene for Dolce Vita in a fountain... but I haven't seen any movies of women going to bed in pantyhose. Stockings - yes, but not pantyhose.
I'd be happy to know what you think.
Jessica http://www.fantasystockings.com/private/ / www.fantasystockings.com/private (pantyhose fetish) http://www.fantasystockings.com/wetlook/ / www.fantasystockings.com/wetlook (wetlook)
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.002 seconds to generate ]