Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 04/05/24 09:14:05 GMT |
Message # 1554 Subject: A Word About the WAM Award... Date: Mon 30/12/02 00:52:05 GMT Name: Jim Email: jim121272@aol.com Website: www.wetlookunlimited.fws1.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Though the WAM award is a good idea, I think some of us are taking it a bit too seriously. Like most other awards, it means little in the grand scheme of things. In the end, it does nothing more than massage the recipient's ego.
The point is being somehow missed here. Voters should take into consideration factors such as how long has the recipient been CONSISTENTLY making contributions to the community, rather than how many photos can be crammed onto the site during the last week of voting. We shouldn't be BUYING votes with the promise of free pictures; the idea is exactly the opposite -- the community should cast their votes for those who have contributed THROUGHOUT THE YEAR, whether it's pictures, videos, stories, or whatever else. Behavior like this is immature and merely cheapens the award. It also begs the question: if the candidates will only give out material in exchange for votes...and they LOSE the award...will material be WITHHELD in a similar manner, as a punishment to those who didn't cast votes in their direction?
Now that I've voiced my opinion (and likely opened a can of worms!), Happy New Year!
Jim
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.001 seconds to generate ]