Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 18/04/24 10:53:57 GMT |
Message # 67013.3.1 Subject: Sorry, I donīt see any improvement Date: Sat 09/04/16 17:10:20 GMT Name: Karl |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Sorry, I donīt see any improvement in the new sets. The illumination is awful in both cases.
The price of 8$ for 5min of not HD films is quit a lot. If you look at the new Wetlookbeauties.com vid more up, Chilling by the pool, its $11.30 for 11:20 min of high quality film. I in this case 1min equal 1$. When you go to Wamtec or others you get 30min for 10 to 15$, that's even less.
Sorry to say: Before you run pay sides you should spend some money in training and learning. As far as I see you donīt have the right feeling to see the problems in your work.
|
In reply to Message (67013.3) Re:Wetlooker new sets?
By Dima - Sat 09/04/16 08:23:45 GMT Not all sets series affected (because most of them was already shoted in previous year), but I think in new places (like these - http://wetlooker.com/?p=23626 and these http://wetlooker.com/?p=23578 ) there are a lot of improvements and more affordable price. Length of video was extended too (from 2 or 3 minutes to 5 in most of sets in new locations and 3+ in old). |
In reply to Message (67013) Wetlooker new sets?
By SoakingSteve - Thu 07/04/16 13:29:23 GMT Has anybody purchased any of the "new and revised" wetlooker sets? I see some that look like they could be promising. My only hold up is, I bought some sets a while back and was very disappointed. It was pretty much wasted money. I really do not want to buy them and get the same as before: blurry shots, 50+ shots of the same pose in the pool. Any input would he greatly appreciated. Thank you. |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.073 seconds to generate ]