Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 29/03/24 01:43:29 GMT |
Message # 67979.6.1 Subject: how about: don't feed the troll? Date: Sun 07/08/16 21:28:50 GMT Name: dfx |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
"Funboy" was just here to provoke:
|
In reply to Message (67979.6) Re:EE you are too slow
By Sunboyfun - sunboyfun@gmail.com Sun 07/08/16 21:04:59 GMT Website: creativewetlook.com EE is an universe unto itself. I think to try to compare it based on frequency of updates is beyond the scope. I know EE does not edit the photos in any painstaking way, which I think Erik even stated would be beyond the scope of intent. Not every set is a winner but that is usually more a matter of taste of the individual than any lapse in quality. I have critiqued Wetlooker much on this site, and probably got people tired of my rants, but I will say they are trying to improve in some of the weak areas. I see some great beach settings and the photography has improved on many sets. I think the videos still need a steady camera hand (some are just sickening to view due to the "up and down" panning. Not gonna win any awards for professional camera work there... Having said that, I don't mind updates which are frequent, or updates which may come at a more leisurely pace. If the quality is there, that is most important. SBF |
In reply to Message (67979) EE you are too slow
By Funboy - Sun 07/08/16 19:47:32 GMT when you compare the output of Wetlooker with EE, he is reaching 20 times the output of EE. And he is a beginner. |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.003 seconds to generate ]