Wetlook World Forum

-His models *always* get their hair wet.

-95% of his sets include videos that are *always* 2-3 times longer, far better resolution/quality than Wetlooker's low quality hand-held shaky cam style that you'd see in a Jason Bourne movie. I'd say only 70% of Wetlooker's sets even 'have' such video.

-So many more exit shots. True understanding of what wetlook is about from EE, which is far better than a model swimming for 5 minutes and a single exit shot. Really?

-Models always get their hair wet. I thought that was a must for wetlook in general.

-Erik never has the models already partially wet from the last scene (bra, underwear, socks) including hair. Hell, what real producer even does this? No time to dry because we're shooting 10 scenes per hour, right?

-It would be great to find a particular model not named 'set', but I guess it's difficult to browse scenes in 2016. Erik doesn't have this issue on his store.

-EE even throws in some muddy/messy scenes, but that's all preference.

-It's no longer such an issue, but lighting on Wetlooker's early work wasn't the best.

So if you want to advertise just how superior Erik is (and has been for decades) then you've done quite well. I'd say the number of responses you got shows just that. I'd also compare Wetlooker's stuff to many Eurowam, Wetfoto, WaminStyle and Leon's wetlook sets+vids, but really there is no comparison.

NOW ~ To be very fair, Wetlooker is definitely improving. He's in business because of it, and for that I applaud him. But despite having great models and outfits, this is what happens when you churn out so many sets per week, you simply lose in quality which is like a waste of potential. That's why he's had so much criticism. He's still got a long way to go, but I'm sure he's heard the feedback. Give him a year or two and he might be on par. Just my 2¢