Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 29/03/24 02:27:51 GMT |
Message # 68471.4 Subject: Re:Leather/PVC Date: Thu 06/10/16 10:38:01 GMT Name: justauser Email: justauser2001-1(at)yahoo.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Wetlook for me is not so much about texture, about the look or such.
Itīs about a girl actually getting wet, being wet. I donīt reduce it to her outer looks, the person doing it (or getting wet by external action and liking/accepting it) is my turn-on. The less suitable the stuff she wears for that is, the better. So leather and shoes are top on my list.
PVC, patent or such is also nice, because I like girls wearing such, dry or wet.
A wet t-shirt contest for example does pretty much nothing for me. Except if the girls keep their pants/skirts AND especially shoes on, for because they donīt care about them or even liking it to soak those.
Normal clothes get washed every time, so their wet state isnīt that special. |
In reply to Message (68471) Leather/PVC
By Wetmac - clive_uk_00@yahoo.com Wed 05/10/16 22:38:41 GMT I am after some opinions here. Does wet leather/PVC really count as wetlook?
Now I know there is an interest in this and it is not up to me to say it is right or wrong. In my opinion I do not really class it as wetlook simply because once the leather/PVC is out of the water then it looks like leather/PVC and has not changed simply because the materials are totally waterproof and the water just runs off them. Not so sure about latex although I suspect it is the same.
Would those who are into this state why they class it as wetlook please and if any of you agree with me also would you please respond.
Remember, this is just my opinion and nobody elses and I am not trying to start an argument, merely asking a simple question..
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.011 seconds to generate ]