Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Fri 19/04/24 07:20:25 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 69898.4.2.2

Subject: Not very simple

Date: Wed 22/03/17 01:34:41 GMT

Name: Dima

Email: dima@wetlooker.com

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

From outside, it's look like me or my photographer just take a model like book from table, push it in water and simple shoot her as he wants, and then put her back. It's look like result can be easily improved.

Actually, there are hundreds of different aspects, troubles, angles in every shooting day in work of each my photographer.

Just few of them:

- Economy, big price for sauna/pool/hotel or just private beach place rent. It's harder when up to 50% of models promises to come and not come really (or take not appropriate outfits), or there is some hours leaking during technical problems with cameras or light.

- Very hard logistic to appoint schedule, a lot of changed during weather conditions, ills and so on.

- Hundreds of tastes and features, which should be combined: color of socks/barefeet, shoes, jeans with or without holes, more back or chest, use or not use underwear, rip or not to rip, leather silk or jeans, formal or sport or casual, shower or pool first, sneakers or converses or running shoes, shampoo, bags, near or far angles of shooting.

- Time to dry hair. Some will not buy without wet hairs or face (and add make-up problems), other will not buy without other their own important things.

- Poor clothes choice of models.

- Due to economy your have very limited time to each set for each models, especially if for most of them it is first time and they dont know how to pose. Or they afraid VERY VERY COLD water in pool, or afraid because can not swim.

- Camera man - additional assistant, which will do his work in his own way with his own mistakes. Or you can not find such assistant and use fixed camera.

- Light! Each 5 session, usually 1 lightflash fires with explosion due to high humidity. We have different locations in each set, so provide light in each point is not so simple to.

It's just few things, which we constantly keep in mind to produce at least at current level.

In reply to Message (69898.4.2)

Re:Some praise for wetlooker.com!

By sunboyfun - sunboyfun@gmail.com Tue 21/03/17 17:13:44 GMT

Website: A needed reprint

Just to reiterate...

If you read closely the post by Nathaar, he is not bashing Wetlooker. He plainly states, as I have many times, that the site offers some of the best wetlook models and many opportunities for amazing photographic results. It is because improvements are so close within reach that we who make constructive critiques WANT the site to be its best. We are not looking to bash them into shutting down. Quite the contrary. I think Dima, if he looked at purchase records recently would see that i have bought a TON of photosets in spite of many past critiques. I have seen improvements as nathaar mentioned. The beach shots are by far the best. I also would have to say that there are still many things I wish would change. The video quality (especially the indoor shots in the tub/shower), or more so, camera work, is absolutely horrendous at times. It can be literally unwatchable. It is analogous to filming a beautiful landmark during an earthquake. If videos are to be offered as an incentive to purchase a set, the videos should meet at the very least an acceptable standard. I would also agree about Nathaar's claim of the "auto shoot", where many repeated redundant shots are taken and also missed opportunities because the photographers do not really "get' wetlook. Hey, truth is truth. To tell Nathaar to just move on misses the point. We are customers, paying, and will continue to pay if the product offered makes it worth while to do so. If something is given away for free, then a case could be made that you should not look a gift horse in the mouth. Nobody expects Wetlooker to become a free site, hardly. However, since it is a site that has major major potential to be superb, wouldn't it be a good idea to hear out critiques and maybe learn from them?

SBF

In reply to Message (69898.4)

Re:Some praise for wetlooker.com!

By Earl - Tue 21/03/17 12:04:19 GMT

Website:

More shit about this fantastic site? Seriously??!

NOBODY updates nearly as regular as Dima.

NOBODY are even close to get more beautiful women wet, than him. All respect to Leon, Flaviu, all the wetlook-gods out there, I love their work and buy a lot of it, but Dima is right now the guy who gets most women wet. In my book, thats worth a lot !

What is wetlook really about? For me, its about the pleasure of watching beautiful women getting wet, with their clothes on. Dimas girls are beautiful, they seem to enjoy what they do, they wear clothes, and they get wet. End of story. I love watching these beauties, all wet. If I want to see perfect photos, I go to a photo-website, only there the girls arent wet.

I dont know why everybody has started picking on this guy, but please, stop doing it. Worst case scenario, he gets tired of making these wonderful girls wet, only receiving shit for it, and we will miss a lot of beautiful wetlook.

IF YOU DONT LIKE, MOVE ON, AND SHUT UP ABOUT IT, LIKE THE REST OF US DO, WITH THE TONS OF STUFF WE DONT APPRECIATE ON THE NET

In reply to Message (69898)

Some praise for wetlooker.com!

By Wambob - Tue 21/03/17 06:15:38 GMT

Website:

I know that some folks here have been somewhat critical of the wetlooker.com site (and some of those at least constructively critical). There's nothing wrong with that, but I'd like to say a few unsolicited positive things about what's becoming my favourite wetlook site:

1) The models are absolutely gorgeous. Really, they're all super cute. And most of them have this "girl next door" quality to them (that is, if you happen to live next door to incredibly hot girls, of course).

2) The models really seem to enjoy what they're doing. The sense of "play" in a lot of their facial expressions is very appealing. I know some people prefer serious "model expressions" in every shot, but I like to see that they're enjoying this "slightly odd" assignment! And most of these girls are.

3) The photography really has improved a lot over the last year or so. Not that I ever found it really as "bad" as some people claimed it was, but it has definitely gotten better, particularly with respect to lighting. There aren't as many dark sets as there used to be, and the photographers are getting better at capturing things like "emerging" shots rather than too many shots of girls swimming around in the pool.

4) If you love wet jeans, there are so many great sets available. That's definitely the site's specialty, and they do it as well as anyone on the net right now, in my opinion. I know that's not everybody's cup of tea. But it's certainly mine. And the site offers all kinds of locations (indoors, outdoors, pools, showers, beaches ...) and continually updates.

Could I quibble that maybe there are a few sets where the photographer doesn't capture "every angle" of his/her beautiful subject? Sure. Or that sometimes the video quality maybe isn't quite as good as the photos? I suppose. But to me, that's kinda missing the point. There's so much brilliant wetlook there!

I just thought it was time to say congratulations to Dima and the team there. You've got one brilliant site. :)

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)