Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 18/04/24 22:31:04 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 74041.16.1

Subject: Re:re: legs

Date: Tue 17/07/18 07:43:31 GMT

Name: RoscoeBC

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

Just curious, when you say covered, do you mean long dress or pants, or do you mean hosiery?

I ask because if you mean legs that are pale and look like they haven't seen the sun for years, I'd agree, if you mean no skirts, or dresses, even with hosiery, then that's an entirely different thing. This may add new light to the popularity of jeans, seeing a girls shape without seeing bare skin, which might be considered indecent.

In reply to Message (74041.16)

re: legs

By plonss - Tue 17/07/18 06:48:47 GMT

Website:

legs should always be covered, bare legs are no wetlook to me

In reply to Message (74041)

Let's talk about legs!

By Dima - dima@wetlooker.com Mon 16/07/18 21:50:37 GMT

Website:

Dear friends!

Thank you for all you replies about top clothes, I will process and systematize it soon, in order to make recipes and requirments for our models to try to satisfy each your taste!

Let's try to collect all wishes about bottom.

1. Jeans, shorts, skirts, pantyhose, joga pants or leggins?

White pants, black or blue jeans?

Keds, sneakers, shoes, high heels, rubber boots, uggs or anything else?

Shoes on barefoot, on with socks (white/colored), or just barefoot at all?

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)