Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 19/04/24 16:18:33 GMT |
Message # 74041.16.1.1 Subject: Re:re: legs Date: Tue 17/07/18 07:47:51 GMT Name: plonss |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I mean dresses or pants, a piece of cloth that gets wet. Bare legs, let's say with shorts, are no wetlook for me |
In reply to Message (74041.16.1) Re:re: legs
By RoscoeBC - Tue 17/07/18 07:43:31 GMT Just curious, when you say covered, do you mean long dress or pants, or do you mean hosiery?
I ask because if you mean legs that are pale and look like they haven't seen the sun for years, I'd agree, if you mean no skirts, or dresses, even with hosiery, then that's an entirely different thing. This may add new light to the popularity of jeans, seeing a girls shape without seeing bare skin, which might be considered indecent. |
In reply to Message (74041.16) re: legs
By plonss - Tue 17/07/18 06:48:47 GMT legs should always be covered, bare legs are no wetlook to me |
In reply to Message (74041) Let's talk about legs!
By Dima - dima@wetlooker.com Mon 16/07/18 21:50:37 GMT Dear friends! Thank you for all you replies about top clothes, I will process and systematize it soon, in order to make recipes and requirments for our models to try to satisfy each your taste! Let's try to collect all wishes about bottom. 1. Jeans, shorts, skirts, pantyhose, joga pants or leggins? White pants, black or blue jeans?
2. Keds, sneakers, shoes, high heels, rubber boots, uggs or anything else? Shoes on barefoot, on with socks (white/colored), or just barefoot at all?
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.013 seconds to generate ]