Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 15/11/24 04:10:14 GMT |
Message # 100375.4.1 Subject: Re:It should be mandatory and part of the forum rules to mark AI-related posts Date: Fri 11/10/24 04:23:37 GMT Name: Propergamer |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
For 99% even the worst live action wetlook is way better than the best AI. As for the poster names, what about the new/uncommon/anonymous posters? Definitely in favor of this rule. |
In reply to Message (100375.4) Re:It should be mandatory and part of the forum rules to mark AI-related posts
By Oldbeewet - Tue 08/10/24 20:37:44 GMT oh yes. it could really make it easier to divide some good AI from pile of bad reallife here. Also, most of the it could easyli be done by looking at the producers name ...... so NA, i don't think we need those markings |
In reply to Message (100375) It should be mandatory and part of the forum rules to mark AI-related posts
By pure-wetlook-fan - Tue 08/10/24 15:19:53 GMT A suggestion: I'm one of those who really isn't a fan of AI images. Ai is great for text-based and work-related purposes. But I personally find AI images terrible, strange, repulsive and very unnatural. My love of the wet look is massively disturbed by this. Personally, I only want to see natural images. Candid, scan, or professional, all ok. But just no AI. If there are friends and fans, that's ok. But I would be of the opinion that the posts in this forum should refer to real wetlook. Other things are also undesirable here. Naked skin, for example, male wetlook, messy posts are not usual here, etc. It should be the same with AI. Clear labeling. umd.net is already leading the way. What do you think?
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.001 seconds to generate ]