Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 03/05/24 02:38:02 GMT |
Message # 18969.1.1.1 Subject: Re: Re: Re: Article covering wetlook Date: Thu 27/10/05 15:43:11 GMT Name: Dress2Splash Email: dress2splash@hotmail.com Website: http://groups.msn.com/DressyDipping |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Hi!
I don't agree at all with the "homosexual" quality that this article ascribes to wetlook. I've never had any interest in clothed-swimming in a pool or lake when only guys are swimming there. I prefer, in fact, to do so in the presence of women who have enjoyed watching me either slowly waltz fully dressed into the water, or dive right in as such.
I do find the mild embarrssment of getting publicly wet in "forbidden" non-swim [dressy] clothing to be a turn-on, myself. The sight of wet ladies, even more so.
But I, for one, have never gotten any thrill from seeing wet guys.
But hey - that's just me, I guess.
- Doug Dress2Splash
|
In reply to Message (18969.1.1) Re: Re: Article covering wetlook
By soggybottom - Thu 27/10/05 15:17:52 GMT Interesting study but it covered just about everything equaly. It just proves that there are as many fetishes as there are people. I don't know if it really proved anything. I'd like to see more. |
In reply to Message (18969.1) Re: Article covering wetlook
By wet36 - Thu 27/10/05 14:44:05 GMT I have seen this before. It is so true I could have written it myself. What do you other wammers think about it?
wet36
|
In reply to Message (18969) Article covering wetlook
By wetonym - Thu 27/10/05 14:28:01 GMT Website: http://www2.hu-berlin.de/sexology/GESUND/ARCHIV/P_WETLOOK.HTM Article covering wetlook:
"Wetlook paraphilia - aspects of a sexual variation"
What are your comments?
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.004 seconds to generate ]