Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 26/04/24 01:12:24 GMT |
Message # 64695.5.1.1 Subject: clarification of my request for clarification! Date: Tue 30/06/15 09:42:05 GMT Name: jollywetfellow |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
In my post above, the kind of video I was wondering about 'postability' would be, say, family parties where adults throw one another in and the kids join in; or the 'post-baptism fun' ones which I referred to in a recent post, where there is a mix of adults and children larking about in the water. There are also many pics and videos of a woman in a tee-shirt holding a very young baby in the water while doting Dad takes a pictures for the album - in these cases the "main subject" is clearly the child and there is no doubt in my mind that these should not be permitted. |
In reply to Message (64695.5.1) Nigel, can you clarify rule 2.6 please
By jollywetfellow - Tue 30/06/15 09:05:39 GMT Website: https://www.flickr.com/photos/105715846@N06/favorites I entirely agree that more mature wetlook content would be nice. But rule 2.6, as written, effectively prevents it. By far the most common reason for any woman over about 25 to go into the water (whether clothed or not) is to be with kids. A strict interpretation of the wording of rule 2.6 ("no images...of any sort") has to be that if there is any child seen in the video, in however minor a role, then it cannot be posted. I have often come across youtubes of older women having fun getting their clothes wet, and thought "the more mature guys on the forum would love this", but then thought "oh no, the ladies have a couple of kids with them too, better not". Is 2.6 really intended to be interpreted as an absolute prohibition of children appearing at all, or does it really mean "no images or videos where a child is the main subject"? |
In reply to Message (64695.5) Re:Underage videos / pictures
By Phil - Tue 30/06/15 07:12:11 GMT I totally agree with Nigel, lots of people have posted tubes of youngsters having fun, they don't mean any harm, but the rule needs enforcing! I personally much prefer mature wetlook pictures / vids. There used to be lots of more mature type content on here but over the years, sadly, all we get now are young slim pretty models. Nothing wrong with that, but I do wish we had a more varied age range. |
In reply to Message (64695) Underage videos / pictures
By Nigel - nigel@wetlook.com Mon 29/06/15 09:25:45 GMT Website: www.wetlook.com There seems to have been an increase lately in the number of videos posted here, mostly from YouTube, featuring clearly underage girls.
This is not acceptable, and is against the rules of the forum ( http://forum.minxmovies.com/rules.html ). If the people concerned continue to post underage clips, then they will be banned from this forum.
2.6 No images of children (under 16) of any sort, or discussion about or relating to children or their activities.
2.7 Images of 16-18 year olds (classed as 'adults' in the UK and most of Europe) should be of a 'soft' nature, and not be overtly sexual.
Please take great care when posting clips.
Nigel Forum Admin
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.016 seconds to generate ]