Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Wed 08/05/24 05:23:13 GMT |
Message # 66561.2.2.1.1.1 Subject: Re:A little review about wetlooker.com Date: Tue 09/02/16 07:28:53 GMT Name: sunboyfun Email: sunboyfun@gmail.com Website: creativewetlook.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Dima,
Yes, the location you just sent a link to is the one that represents the most problematic sets. It could be a combination of the conditions there (aka, lighting) or simply that a particular photographer is "assigned" that locale and needs some tips on better photo-taking. I was happy to see the above camera settings from our fellow photog friend. They look good to me as a starting point for sure. SBF |
In reply to Message (66561.2.2.1.1) Re:A little review about wetlooker.com
By Dima - Mon 08/02/16 21:50:48 GMT Thank you so much, we will try! You mean sets in this place, yes? Or other? http://wetlooker.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/IMG_9808-280x420.jpg |
In reply to Message (66561.2.2.1) Re:A little review about wetlooker.com
By Slawomirro - Mon 08/02/16 21:34:35 GMT Ok, some tips for you (I am a photographer, too)
Your photos have EXIF, so I could write it:
- set your Nikon 5100 for M or Tv mode - set a minimum 1/160s (or shorter) - set f/5.6-8.0 max (quality photos after f/8.0 are worse) - set ISO at 800-1600 for photos without a flash or ISO-200 with flash - use an external flash
|
In reply to Message (66561.2.2) Re:A little review about wetlooker.com
By Dima - Mon 08/02/16 15:52:41 GMT PLEASE, do not draw early conclusions! We got about 700+ replies to this survey, and immediately implement most asked from them (no smoking, no so much ripping clothes, more different shoes and so on). Now we are posting sets, that was shooted at previous year) Just wait a little, please! All your suggestions is very important for us! |
In reply to Message (66561.2) Re:A little review about wetlooker.com
By SouthFloridaWet - Mon 08/02/16 13:45:42 GMT I am glad I am not the only one who noticed this. The part I think that is funny about this is, didn't he/she send out a survey a while back for people to fill out? I remember numerous posts where quite a few chimed in with some constructive criticism. Some said different outfits (I said mini skirts along with a lot of others), different shooting angles, a better camera, better lighting, models looking like they enjoy it, etc. Well, I can say I am glad I WASTED my time with that survey and writing a constructive response to help. So many good points how Dima could improve the site and make it better, and EVERY point must have been ignored. If somebody wants help to fix something..... Sure, but you can't fix ignorance. Why was that survey published if nothing was taken from it? |
In reply to Message (66561) A little review about wetlooker.com
By Slawomirro - Mon 08/02/16 11:05:39 GMT wetlooker.com
The same sneakers, simmilar clothes. I think that a producer have sneakers and clothes for girls. Very often girls in a next set has wet underwear and hair on dry clothes. It's mean, new sets are shot one after one.
I bought 7-8 sets. Some photos are a blur, many photos are upload horizontaly, not vertically. EXIF exist, so for example, from start to end, a whole one set was made in 10-12 minutes.
quantity not quality... it is a motto for wetlooker.com
Some people are very angry for wetlooker.com because wetlook sites like eewetlook.com, eurowam.com, mostwam.com, ect. accustomed us for a quality.
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.002 seconds to generate ]