Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Mon 13/05/24 11:36:52 GMT |
Message # 78174.1.1 Subject: I thought it’s maybe just the language barrier... Date: Sun 18/08/19 11:44:31 GMT Name: MikeyABQ |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
As some producers seem to speak very bad English and / or use Google translate and some languages have different descriptors used, like for instance in Arabic many over the top comparisons are normal, but lately as this trend has gotten more pronounced and absurd, I think it’s intentional.
Thankfully as far as I know few wetlook models frequent this forum, few even take interest in their photos after those are made (when they gonup etc) it’s just a gig for them, so I guess they don’t see all this. |
In reply to Message (78174.1) I agree - and already commented on that
By plonss - Sun 18/08/19 11:29:50 GMT Some producers go out of their to find weird and denigrating terms, and I think they should stop with that |
In reply to Message (78174) Anyone else fed up with the way women are described in some posts?
By TrickyTrev - Sun 18/08/19 10:21:25 GMT I know I'm probably going to get lots of negatives for this post, but I wondered what others' views are? There seems to be an increasing amount of "This hot chick" and "slim girl" and "these girls love to get wet" kind of posts. I've been into wetlook as long as I can remember, and for me I love the whole thing of women enjoying having a laugh whilst getting wet. For me Leonmoomin is a perfect example. It's not sexual, it's fun - and that makes it sexy.
Of late there seems to be an increased churn of over emphasised sexual posts where it looks to be overly sexual, slightly derogatory to women, and more pornhub talk than wetlook. These "girls" should have some respect attached to them!
Sorry for the rant, just wondered if I'm getting too old and set in my ways.
Leonmoomin - you're a hero
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.026 seconds to generate ]