minx

Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Fri 10/05/24 14:08:04 GMT

Translate page FROM gb -> TO de fr it nl es pt jp

Translate page TO gb <- FROM de fr it nl es pt jp

Wetlook-Online
Wetlook-Online

Message # 82281.3.1

Subject: None Re:GWC vs a photographer

Date: Tue 11/08/20 15:42:42 GMT

Name: Tom Servo uu

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

Previous Reply
Next New Message
Active List Archive

Thank you for the insight, it's a lot clearer now! And I have to be honest, I am somewhat starstruck :)
In reply to Message (82281.3) Scatter Re:GWC vs a photographer

By EdwinR - asplashofglamour@gmail.com uu Mon 10/08/20 00:14:39 GMT

Website: https://www.asplashofglamour.com// www.asplashofglamour.com


I never felt that I had an identity crisis. Since childhood I've always had an interest in photography. I wasn't really good at it, because back then we just had film cameras, and those were much harder to master. I understood the concept of photography, and I wanted to be good, but I had a really hard time taking good pictures. When I bought my first digital camera, I started to get it and I was able to take better photos, but it still took years of trial and effort. I really enjoy the creativity of taking photos and when I started shooting wetlook sets, I wanted to continue to be as creative as possible although honestly, it's very tough to come up with unique ideas. I always tried to push the bar upwards in my photography skills, even taking on the challenge of underwater photography.   

 

The difference between a GWC and a photographer is reputation. You can either be the guy who acts like a professional and tries to take the best photos possible, or you can be the guy who wants to date the models, and creep them out.

 

EdwinR

In reply to Message (82281) None GWC vs a photographer

By Tom Servo - uu Sat 08/08/20 01:27:44 GMT

Website:


I've recently started taking my own wetlook pictures and I've realized I got a bit of an identity crisis...in photography we all know the guy with the camera, basically the guy who just wants to get girls naked in front of the camera. How does one know they are not their wetlook equivalent? I tried to put effort into the few sessions I did, but I am not sure how much artistic value the pictures I am taking have. Did anyone of more experienced wetlook photographers ever wondered about the same thing, is it just the passion and skill? My favorite photographers, and whose work I have been inspired by are Edwin R, Marcus (ImagesbyMR), ENNEroduction.

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

All WAM Drunk Sex Orgy WetLooker.com
WetlookPOV.com

Minx Movies - M12 - Dressed in Wet is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M15 - Wet Me Now is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M14 - Get Wet With Me is now in the Download Store
2ipmd65.jpg2ipmdg2.jpgckfbj77.jpgjapgs25.jpgzgjbt99.jpg Download Store 2fpbs94.jpgkijws74.jpgrlsps97.jpglasbjg7.jpg2fptg96.jpg2gpdde7.jpg


Minx Movies - M8 - Mask Of Wetness is now in the Download Store
Download Store



[ This page took 0.031 seconds to generate ]