Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 11/05/24 06:18:32 GMT |
Message # 87514.5 Subject: Re:Why is wet look grouped with messy? Date: Wed 02/02/22 13:54:03 GMT Name: Bruno Email: brunokeller@hotmail.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I believ that comes from the seventies when we were an extremly small and bad-linked minority.
Me, I am in wetlook only. At least I was happy when I had discovered some muddy people and tooks ome part of their experience as "wet" - because there is no dry mud. Same it was with the splosh-people I discovered in the 80ies.
The early terms were hydrophopiles wet-shots, and wet-lovers and so on before wet&messy (wam) & Splosh etc. appeared.
Today I am glad we have a working forum / community - and I am free reading the wet-only stuff. ;-))
|
In reply to Message (87514) Why is wet look grouped with messy?
By shell-din - Tue 01/02/22 22:32:52 GMT Can someone explain it to me, While I love wet look, i love how it accentuates the body, displaying the nipples and makes it very form fitting. I do not understand the erotic side of mud or slime. My wife occasionally will surprise me by joining me in the shower or offer me a show after a night out. But never would I ask her to step into a mud puddle or think of sliming her. Women in the pictures I see, seem more like a victim then someone who is enjoying it. Just one mans opinion, but curious how they ended up being connected.
I would be curious from producers, especially on the custom orders, do more people order wet look vids or muddy/WAM vids.
cheers y'all
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.008 seconds to generate ]