Wetlook World Forum

Looking at this scene in detail:

First of all, should have been filmed from behind, not the side.

Secondly, they should have been told to step down the ladder all the way, not "sit down" in the water - would give a better view.

Thirdly, it suffers from the perennial problem of wetlook and wam videos in general, the videographer is obsessed with keeping their heads/faces in view, and as a result manages to cut off the actual important shots of their feet and lower legs entering the water.  I imagine sneaker fans in particular would be furious as the all important "dry shoes entering the water" shots have been pointlessly lost.  Not quite as bad for us jeans fans as we get to see about 80% of the action shot including the really important "thighs and bum getting wet".  But still annoying to see the error.

When shooting a wetlook video, the all-important point is where the model's dry shoes or clothes are making first contact with and entering the water.  Having that in shot is absolutely vital.  Having the model's head in shot at that point is irrelevant.  But of course everyone remembers being told as a kid when they first picked up a camera, "make sure their head is in shot", and then fails to realise that there's a difference between taking family snapshots and producing fetish videos.  And that's not a criticism of Wetlooker, I've seen dozens of producers make exactly the same mistake over the years.

And after all that, how come this video is public, have Wetlooker authorised it to be given away?